Igor Schechter If talk about traditional teaching methods, his huge disadvantage - that is what is taught as an end in itself, but it is not. Language - a tool for communication, the very same communication is the goal. You can learn to read and write in a foreign language, but you do not understand the spoken language. Therefore, in learning the language fully, you need to understand it by ear. It is very important to communicate in the process of learning a foreign language. Live it must inherently be present in time learning the language. Method based on emotional-semantic mode of learning. Schechter suggests activation of the material, not just its presentation in the learning process. The method is a thin, the correct approach to learning. Method consists of a set of techniques with a kind of technology to fully explore the instructor. Method is very different from how we are with you learned in school. Even and if you have mastered the curriculum, then, as a rule, when dealing with a foreigner, you hardly pronounce the most basic phrases, and only with an understanding of what he says quite tight. The method of Schechter - Spoken method (Emotional sense) - includes communicating with foreigners, with the teacher who owns colloquial speech, main difference between the emotional-semantic approach is its focus on the development of living speech. Method Schechter provides an opportunity to speak intelligently, without reproducing the memorized phrases and constructions in speech patterns, so to speak, as is the usual for a man in his life circumstances, ie, express their personal attitude to events in which he participates, he lives. Thirty years of experience in education, an approach to language acquisition, which has been scientifically substantiated, the classes that are conducted on a new, modern technology - all this...
Ready Voter One of the first questions that arise at the idea of representative democracy - whether it promotes the power of the people best able to cope with the tasks corresponding to positions for which they elect? Another problematic place of electoral democracy - match campaign promises real action being taken following the election of a candidate for his position, that is, simply - lies and manipulation in the election or in the name of the rating in the political season. It is believed that the problem of non-candidate of their promises to the electorate decides the practice of political competition for votes. In fact, guided by common meaning or unwillingness to be deceived a second time, voters at the next election should support political opponents "guilty" or a campaign to collect signatures for the feedback people's choice (if procedure required by law). In fact, we see a picture of what you can to voice an allegorical way: the hydra heads of many politicians, and the place of the severed grow new ones. All political forces promise voters a guaranteed opportunity to meet immediate needs and goals, promise a bright future, successful development strategy, respect for history and so on. often differ only by their brands. But even if candidate or party are sincere in seeking to solve a particular problem, how to state voters from election to election we fall more and more expensive barrage of campaigning, to objectively evaluate the possibility of this or that political power is better than others to cope with this problem (or, in principle, handle)? In my opinion, one of the steps in improving the system of representative democracy would be a system of certification for admission to exercise your right to vote as an elector.

Recent Comments