01/22/2014

NEXT POST
Summarizing Psychology It is this openness and the ability to be flexible in the relationship leads to an explanation of the following features - why Women are easier to manage and manipulate. Tune to a wave of cooperation, unity with others, allows a woman is much easier to change your plans, make adjustments in your actions. It is true that a significant role is played by more women desire to be under the 'wing of the patron', the roots of drifting to the days when the concept of women's rights is not something that is not raised, but not quite there. When women's role was only to a successful marriage with a partner, who carefully chose the older generation, to the maximum considering all the possible benefits of marriage. Thus, in a woman's mind is firmly entrenched setting that man - Is not only an indicator of the attractiveness of women, but also a way to solve many material and social problems. Interweaving of these factors and gives up the ease of managing the woman mentioned above. Hence, too, smoothly follows and is another feature of female psychology - the unpredictability, inconsistency. The ability to attract and keep a man, and therefore - to solve the material and other problems led to that self-esteem women became dependent on her appeal. To exit from a state of internal conflict with herself, she will need constant confirmation that she is loved, beautiful and desirable - this explains the numerous claims that are always imposed the stronger sex. Responsibility for the creation of such a provision is only a woman, but without realizing it, she attempts to leave the state of discomfort at the expense of men - this creates the very peculiarity of feminine psychology, which is called the 'unpredictable behavior. " Summarizing, we...
PREVIOUS POST
Sociological Interpretation The LACK OF UNIFORMITY METODOLGICA IN the RESEARCH AND SOCIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF the SOCIAL REALITY For Jlio Rangel Borges Grandson sociology contemporary nothing more is of what the result of the classic Sociology of centuries XVIII and mainly of century XIX and beginning of the XX with strong base in the theoretical and scientific production of Durkheim and Weber and in good measured of Karl Marx. Of this done one, a radical disruption with all is not possible this structure that continues to influence the Sociology that if make today and the one that will come later. However, a complicador factor for a more trustworthy theoretical production inhabits in the multiplicity of taken methods the effect for each social scientist in particular. Such variety in the processes of research and interpretation of the social reality is not exclusiveness only of the current times, such born in the kingdom theoretical and metodolgica confusion since the primrdios and process of consolidation of social Sciences (sociology), compromising the sociological interpretation as a whole, after all use of methods and different processes for each observer/social scientist finishes for if making to arrive the different results and contradictory agreements inexorably/. A good example of all this metodolgica diversity/theoretician can be removed of the proper fundantes members of Sociology, namely Weber, Durkheim and Marx. Durkheim constructed most of its scientific workmanship on of the comparative method, to weber in turn conceived its sociological analyses and theories by means of the comprehensive method and finally Karl Marx if it guided in its research under the optics of the dialtico method of remote origin in the philosophy. As it is possible to perceive this diversity of research methods and consequence lack of standardization and uniformity in the way to search to interpret the social reality finishes for compromising...

Recent Comments